干预主义、机制与实际的性质因果  

Interventionist Theories of Causation,Mechanisms and Actual Property Causation

作　　者：裘江杰[1] QIU Jiangjie(School of Philosophy,Renmin University of China,Beijing,100872)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2022年第1期1-9,共9页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：教育部人文社科研究规划项目“形式化视域下的实际因果研究”(项目编号:21YJAZH069)。

摘　　要：近年来心智因果与随附因果的讨论成为因果问题研究中的一个热点。借助机制的概念,本文分离并说明这些讨论中所关注的是实际的性质因果,进而分析了这一讨论中两位主要学者伍德瓦德与钟磊的干预主义因果理论,指出其优劣;最后在他们的基础上发展出一种更为简洁的干预主义理论,这一理论可能更适于分析实际的性质因果。In recent years,the research on mental causation and supervenient causation has become a hot topic in the study of causation.By virtue of the concept of mechanisms,this paper separates and illustrates that what is concerned in these discussions is actual property causation.After clarifying this point,this paper then analyzes the interventionist causal theories of Woodward and Zhong Lei,two leading scholars in the field of this research,and points out their strengths and weaknesses.Finally,based on their theories,a more concise interventionist theory is developed,which may be more suitable for analyzing the actual property causation.

关 键 词：实际因果 性质因果 干预主义因果理论 机制 

分 类 号：N0[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]