风险社会视域下环境法制的变数分析与回应  

The Variable Analysis and Response of Environmental Legal System from the Perspective of Risk Society

作　　者：任晒 Ren Shai

机构地区：[1]韶关市委党校,广东韶关512029

出　　处：《鄱阳湖学刊》2021年第6期91-101,127,共12页Journal of Poyang Lake

基　　金：2020年广东省韶关市哲学社会科学规划课题“广东林业碳汇交易的法理分析与制度完善”(Z2020002);2021年广东省党校(行政学院)系统哲学社会科学规划课题“生态产品价值化的法制保障机制研究:现实困境与完善策略”(2021GDDXXT064)。

摘　　要：因应风险社会的现实境遇,回应型法是中国环境法制发展的必然方向。目的、规则、政治、参与、合法性、推理等作为法律发展的基本变数,在风险社会呈现出新的态势:安全价值的社会共识树立了生态保护的目的权威;风险不确定性引发环境规则的部分调整;风险分配正义的诉求导致政治意图对法制系统的渗透;信任体系的消解与重构带来公众参与的契机。回应目的、规则、政治、参与等主要法律变数的新态势,环境法制应当在立法目的上扩展生态保护的肯定性权威,在规则调整上适用包容性风险预防原则,在生态任务的落实上推进政治责任的法制化,在公众参与的制度保障上作出风险沟通的程序安排。In response to the reality of the risk society, the responsive law is the inevitable direction of the development of China’s environmental legal system. The purpose, rules, politics, participation, legitimacy,reasoning, etc., as the basic variables of legal development, present a new trend in the risk society in that the social consensus on the value of safety has established the authority of the purpose of ecological protection, the risk uncertainty has triggered some partial adjustments in environmental rules, the appeal of risk distribution justice has led to the infiltration of political intent into the legal system, and the deconstruction and reconstruction of social trust system has brought opportunities and requirements for public participation. In response to the new trend of legal variables such as the purpose, rules, politics, and participation,the environmental legal system should extend the affirmative authority of the legislative purpose of ecological protection, apply the inclusive risk prevention principle in the adjustment of compensation and relief rules, promote the legalization of political responsibilities in the implementation of the political tasks of ecological civilization, and set up the procedural arrangement of risk communication on the system guarantee of public participation.

关 键 词：风险社会 环境法制 肯定性权威 包容性风险预防原则 生态政治责任法制化 

分 类 号：D912.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]