同案同判下司法技术与情理的平衡  

The Balance between Judicial Technology and Tradition of Sentiment-ethics-law under the Same Case Same Verdict Obligation

作　　者：王静[1] WANG Jing(Institute of History of Legal Civilization,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律文明史研究院,上海200042

出　　处：《法学论坛》2022年第1期29-40,共12页Legal Forum

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目《中华法系与中华法律文化问题研究》(20@ZH038);中国博士后科学基金第69批面上资助项目《基于中国问题的西班牙语国家养老保险法比较研究》(2021M693536)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：同案同判旨在通过指导案例和类案检索制度促进法律统一适用,从而树立司法公信力。同案同判表示着司法技术化趋势,而司法技术化是中国近代以来愈加推崇的形式理性及其所引领的市场经济、科技发展的必然结果。同案同判一方面保证了法律的确定性与司法的形式正义,另一方面却因法律适用过程中的技术化操作牺牲了部分个案的实质正义。既然同案同判的最终目的是向社会树立司法公正价值,那么就必须兼顾社会公正观。当代社会的主流公正观是在法治前提下追求情理法兼容。这是法律儒家化的结果,符合中华文明的和谐平衡观,是传统司法的首要原则。司法技术化与传统情理法的冲突,深层次是中西文化、传统与现代的冲突。近代以来,中国对技术过度迷信,导致司法公正与民众公正观的间隙扩大。这需以情理法兼容的传统予以调和,使司法不仅仅是科学的法律知识与程序之学,更是兼顾伦理观的司法技艺。司法技术只能作为解决当前司法适用不统一的过渡与辅助手段,长远来看,需通过拓展法官的综合知识与培育伦理素质以正确适用、阐释法律。The purpose of the same case same verdict is to promote the uniform application of law through directing cases and case retrieval system, so as to realize the social effect of judicial justice. The same case same verdict shows the trend of judicial technique, which is the inevitable result of the development of market economy and technology led by the formal rationality advocated by China. On the one hand, same case same verdict ensures the certainty of law and the formal justice, on the other hand, it sacrifices the substantive justice of some cases due to the technical operation in the application of law. Since the ultimate goal of same case same verdict is to establish the image of judicial justice to the society, the idea of social justice should be taken into account. The mainstream idea of justice in contemporary society is to pursue the compatibility of sentiment-ethics-law under the premise of rule of law. The traditional sentiment-ethics-law is the result of the legal legal confucianism, which accords with the harmonious balance view of Chinese civilization and is the primary principle of traditional justice. The conflict between judicial technology and traditional sentiment-ethics-law is the conflict between Chinese and Western culture, tradition and modernity. Since modern times, the excessive superstition to technology of China has led to the widening of the gap between judicial justice and public justice. It needs to be reconciled with the traditional sentiment-ethics-law, so that justice is not only the science of legal knowledge and procedure, but also the judicial craft which taking into account the justice idea of public. Judicial technology can only be used as a transitional and auxiliary means to solve the disunity of current judicial application. In the long run, it is necessary to expand judges’ comprehensive knowledge and cultivating their law ethical qualities in order to correctly apply and interpret law.

关 键 词：同案同判 情理法 司法公正 指导案例 类案检索 法律文化 司法公信力 

分 类 号：D904[政治法律—法学理论]