中国内地、港澳地区商标判例之法律解释与司法哲学比较研究  

A Comparative Study on Legal Interpretation and Judicial Philosophy of Trademark Cases in the Mainland,Hong Kong and Macao

作　　者：易在成[1] 李传章 Yi Zaicheng;Li Chuanzhang

机构地区：[1]澳门科技大学法学院

出　　处：《海关与经贸研究》2021年第6期67-81,共15页Journal of Customs and Trade

摘　　要：在粤港澳大湾区国际科创中心建设、WTO及WIPO知产保护规则对内地、港澳之约束背景下,内地、香港与澳门三法域跨域商标之保护具有紧迫性及必要性。但因长久历史中,三法域由于文化背景割裂、地理位置差异、经济发展水平不同、科技创新成果不一以及法律制度迥异,三法域各自的商标制度与商标案件审判实质上存在较大差异,亟需对三法域商标制度以及三法域商标之案例判决进行比较研究。本文基于法律解释与司法哲学比较的视角,采取“审议重点—法院说理—案例评价”的分析方法,选取内地、港澳三法域商标相关典型判例进行比较分析,以管窥三法域商标法律的司法适用之共性与差异。商标法律既具有自我实现的特性,也具备高度的公共政策特征,本文对具体商标案件之判决进行解读,探讨三法域商标法律的共同发展之理论基础,回应三法域商标制度完善与加强跨法域合作之要求。Under the context of the construction of the International Center of Innovative Technology in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and the constraints of WTO and WIPO intellectual property protection rules on the Mainland,Hong Kong and Macau,it is urgent and necessary to protect trademarks across the three jurisdictions of the Mainland,Hong Kong and Macau.However,due to the separation of the cultural background of the three jurisdictions,differences in geographic location,disparities in economic development,different achievements in technological innovation,and different legal systems in the long history,the trademark systems of the three jurisdictions and the trials of trademark cases vary substantially.Thus there is pressing need to compare the trademark system of the three jurisdictions and case judgments of the three jurisdictions.Based on the perspective of judicial philosophy comparison and legal interpretation,this paper adopts the method of"deliberation focus-court reasoning-case analysis",and probes into typical cases related to trademarks in the mainland,Hong Kong,and Macao to grasp the commonalities and distinctions in the judicial application of trademark laws in the three jurisdictions.Trademark law features self-actualization and high-level public policy.Interpreting the judgments of specific trademark cases from a macro perspective not only provides a theoretical basis for the joint development of trademark laws in the three jurisdictions,but also probably meets the requirements for modifying the trademark systems of the three jurisdictions and deepening cooperation.

关 键 词：商标判例 商标保护 商标功能论 商标财产论 法律解释 司法哲学 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]