检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余红[1] 罗维宇 YU Hong;LUO Weiyu(School of Law,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu Sichuan,610500,China)
出 处:《西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第1期1-8,共8页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:目前,我国石油天然气管道地下通过权的法律性质不明,导致在具体实践过程中油气企业和土地权利人之间纠纷不断,给顺利推进我国石油天然气管道建设和维护带来了较大的阻碍。在法律上确认石油天然气管道地下通过权的性质,既是保护管道安全、保障油气事业发展的需要,也有利于后期对土地的利用与开发、对管道的建设与保护、对当事人权利与义务的明晰。设立地役权是解决我国石油天然气管道地下通过权纠纷问题的有效途径。当前,我国可以审慎思考构建地役权制度,通过充分发挥地役权制度的法律价值来弥补现行地役权的不足,以便推进石油天然气管道地下通过纠纷得到更好的解决。At present,the legal nature of the right of underground passage of oil and gas pipelines in China is unclear,which leads to constant disputes between oil and gas enterprises and land owners in practice,and brings great obstacles to the construction and maintenance of oil and gas pipelines in China.It is necessary to recognize the legal nature of pipeline underground passage right in law in order to protect pipeline safety and the development of oil and gas industry,to ensure future land exploitation and pipelines construction and maintenance,and to clarify rights and obligations of the concerned parties.Easement is the best way to solve the disputes over the right of pipeline underground passage of oil and gas.We should think carefully about the easement system,give full play to the legal value of the easement system to make up for the deficiency of the current easement system,and promote better solution of the dispute of the oil and gas pipelines.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.132.143