如何完善针对卫生行政机关不作为的法律救济机制  

On the Improvement of Legal Remedy Mechanism of Health Administrative Organs'Omission

作　　者：张玉鹏 冉晔[2] 邓勇[2] Zhang Yupeng;Ran Ye;Deng Yong

机构地区：[1]甘李药业股份有限公司全球法律事务部 [2]北京中医药大学法律系

出　　处：《医学与法学》2022年第1期104-108,共5页Medicine and Jurisprudence

摘　　要：患方请求卫生行政机关解决其与医方的纠纷时,常有后者不予答复、拒绝履行和拖延履行等不作为的情形,但针对其不作为而设计的法律救济机制却在运行中存在诸多问题:在行政复议机制中,复议机构的中立性不足、复议人员的专业性欠缺、复议审查的程序性约束低;在行政诉讼机制中,行政判决对患方的救济力度弱、执行难。鉴此,应在行政复议机制中,设立卫生行政复议委员会,引入医学、法学专业人员参与复议工作,采用听取意见、调查等非书面审查为主的审查方式,以增强卫生行政复议的独立性、专业性和程序正义;在行政诉讼机制中针对不作为的不同情形进行裁判,并通过多种方式解决执行难的问题。When the patient requests the health administrative organs to solve the dispute with the doctor,the latter often fails to respond,refuses to perform or delays the performance,and there are many problems in the opera⁃tion of the legal remedy mechanism designed for its omission:in the administrative reconsideration mechanism,the neutrality of the reconsideration organization is insufficient,the professional of the reconsideration personnel is insuf⁃ficient,and the procedural constraints of the reconsideration review are low;in administrative litigation mechanism,administrative judgment is weak in relief and difficult to execute.In view of this,health administrative review com⁃mittee should be set up in the administrative review mechanism,medical and legal professionals should be intro⁃duced to participate in the review work,and non-written review methods such as listening to opinions and investiga⁃tion should be adopted to enhance the independence,professionalism and procedural justice of health administrative review;in the mechanism of administrative litigation,different cases of omission are judged and the problem of diffi⁃cult execution is solved through various ways.

关 键 词：卫生行政 不作为 法律救济 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]