国际非正规住房空间测度进展与政策启示--基于三个研究案例的比较  

Progress and Policy Implications of International Measuring Housing-informality:Based on the comparison of three cases

作　　者：于江浩 YU Jianghao

机构地区：[1]清华大学建筑学院城市规划系

出　　处：《住区》2021年第6期22-27,共6页Design Community

基　　金：北京卓越青年科学家计划(JJWZYJH01201910003010)。

摘　　要：伴随我国的快速城市化与经济高速增长,非正规住房空间广泛存在并不断扩张。这些区域在满足城市发展需要、为低收入人口提供住所的同时,引发了一系列的社会经济问题。随着传统的运动式拆违、大规模异地安置等治理模式的弊端逐渐显现,基于精细化测度与评价的综合治理需求日趋强烈。本文以美国、非洲、印度三个非正规住区测度探索作为案例,梳理非正规住房空间测度的思路和研究重点,并从“非正规住区的多维价值”、“精细测度下的分类施策”等角度为我国非正规住房空间治理提供参考和建议。There is a wide range of informal housing space in China’s urban expansion and economic development.While meeting the needs of urban development and provid-ing shelter for low-income people,it has triggered a series of social and economic problems.With the disadvantages of the traditional“sports demolition”and large-scale re-settlement,there is an increase in the demand of compre-hensive treatment based on fine measurement and evalu-ation.Taking the measurement and exploration of informal housing in the United States,Africa and India as cases,this paper reviews the existing theories and research concern-ing informal housing spatial measurement,providing policy implications for China’s informal housing spatial gover-nance from two perspectives:“multi-dimensional value of informal housing”and“classified measures under fine mea-surement”.

关 键 词：住区 城市非正规性 非正规住房 非正规空间测度 城市治理 

分 类 号：TU984.37[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]