当代西方政治哲学中关于平等理论的歧见及困境  

Disagreement and Dilemma about Equality Theory in Contemporary Western Political Philosophy

作　　者：胡爱娟 HU Ai-juan(The College of Politics and Public Administration,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387,China)

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学政治与行政学院,天津300387

出　　处：《赤峰学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第1期44-50,共7页Journal of Chifeng University：Philosophy and Social Science Chinese Edition

基　　金：2020年度国家社科基金后期资助重点项目“代际正义理论研究”(20FZZA002)。

摘　　要：平等作为一种重要的价值,是学者们孜孜以求的目标。然而,随着平等理论的深入发展,平等面临着内外双重之争的尴尬境地,从外部看来,要不要平等?平等是否是自然的?就内部来说,一方面是平等物之争,要“什么样的平等?”另一方面,平等和责任的关系问题。围绕这些争论,学者们众说纷纭,并基于不同的路径构建了具有各自特点的平等理论范式,形成了丰富而庞大的平等理论体系。然而,纵观现实,西方社会中的平等问题特别是贫富分化问题与日俱增,理论层面的丰富与现实生活的不平等形成了巨大的反差,这成了当代西方平等理论所面临的最大困境。As an important value,equality is the goal of scholars.However,with the in-depth development of equality theory,equality is facing an embarrassing situation of internal and external dual disputes.From the outside,should we be equal?Is equality right?From an internal point of view,on the one hand,there is a struggle for equality,and"what kind of equality?"On the other hand,there is a question of the relationship between equality and responsibility.Around these controversies,scholars have divergent opinions,and based on different paths,they have constructed equality theory paradigms with their own characteristics,forming a rich and huge equality theory system.However,looking at reality,equality issues in Western society,especially the polarization between the rich and the poor,are increasing day by day.The richness of theory and the inequality of real life have formed a huge contrast,which has become the biggest dilemma faced by contemporary Western equality theories.

关 键 词：平等主义 责任 运气 困境 

分 类 号：D0[政治法律—政治学]