电子商务平台中知识产权错误通知的法律规制研究  

Research on the Legal Regulation of Erroneous Intellectual Property Notification on E-commerce Platforms

作　　者：王文敏 WANG Wenmin

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学法学院,广州510006

出　　处：《华南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期177-191,208,共16页Journal of South China Normal University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：知识产权错误通知给健康有序的电子商务平台经济造成极大的干扰,目前法律对错误通知仍存在规制路径不清、要件认定不足、责任承担不明的问题。在规制路径上,现有司法实践应改变向侵权法一般条款和反不正当竞争法一般条款逃逸的趋势,更多地适用具体的商业诽谤条款。在要件认定上,有必要从商业诽谤条款切入,通过对商业诽谤条款过错、方式、内容和损害四个要件的再解释,对错误通知展开细致的分析。在责任承担上,目前错误通知责任承担的主观要件争议较大,要明确停止侵害和损害赔偿两种责任承担对过错的要求并不相同,停止侵害责任的承担无需过错,损害赔偿责任的承担适用过错推定责任原则。Erroneous intellectual property notification exerts a great negative influence on the economy based on e-commerce platforms. However,at present,there are some difficulties in using the law to regulate erroneous notification such as unclear regulation path,insufficient understanding of the constituent elements and unclear responsibility. From the perspective of regulation path,the current judicial practice should change the trend of resorting to the general provisions of the tort law and the anti-unfair competition law and apply more specific trade defamation provisions. In the identification of elements,it is necessary to start with the trade defamation clause and make a detailed analysis of the erroneous notification through the reinterpretation of the four elements of the trade defamation clause,i.e.,fault,mode,content and damage. In terms of liability,the subjective elements of liability for erroneous notification are controversial at present. It is necessary to make it clear that the requirements for fault are different between the two liabilities of stopping infringement and damage. There is no need for fault to stop infringement,and the principle of presumption of fault is applicable to compensation for damage.

关 键 词：电子商务平台 知识产权 错误通知 “通知—删除”规则 商业诽谤 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]