检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:阿尔达克·别肯 Aldak Beken(School of Intellectual Property,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050)
出 处:《中阿科技论坛(中英文)》2022年第1期200-205,共6页China-Arab States Science and Technology Forum
摘 要:随着互联网技术的高速发展,互联网不正当竞争行为纠纷案件逐渐成为司法关注焦点。我国现有《反不正当竞争法》未将非类型化竞争行为予以归类,司法裁决通常根据一般条款进行规制。但从历来司法判决来看,不同法院对一般条款的适用规则不一,实践中判断行为是否具有正当性时的判断要素并不统一,缺乏具有普遍适用性的认定框架。对于此类互联网不正当竞争的规制,有必要形成稳固的“竞争利益—竞争关系—竞争损失”分析框架构建不正当认定标准,借助一定的法经济效益理论作为正当性判定的补充标准。With the rapid advancement of Internet technology,dispute cases of Internet unfair competition behavior have gradually become the focus of judicial attention.The existing“Anti-Unfair Competition Law”in China does not classify non-typed competition behaviors,and judicial rulings are usually regulated in accordance with general clauses.However,judging from historical judicial judgments,different courts have varying application rules and judgment elements for general clauses,and lack a universally applicable determination framework.In view of this,this article believes that for the regulation of Internet unfair competition,it is necessary to form a solid“competitive interests-competitive relationship-competitive loss”analysis framework to construct unfair determination standards,with certain legal economic benefit theory as the supplementary criteria for legitimacy judgment.
关 键 词:互联网不正当竞争行为 非类型化 比例原则 一般条款
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117