检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡鹏鹏 翟相娟[1] Hu Pengpeng;Zhai Xiangjuan
出 处:《南海法学》2022年第1期94-103,共10页The South China Sea Law Journal
基 金:教育部2021年度人文社会科学规划项目“个人征信行为中‘同意’机制研究”(项目批准号:21YJA820030)。
摘 要:数字经济背景下,具有不可删除性特征的区块链技术给个人信息删除权的法律保护带来极大挑战,其背后也折射出技术创新与权利保护、技术伦理之间的价值冲突,直面冲突、回应挑战是立法的不二选择。为了在区块链技术背景下更好地实现信息主体对抗无限记忆的删除权,我们有必要从宏观和微观两个层面来化解区块链技术与删除权立法之间的冲突。宏观层面坚持在人本、包容的数字治理理念基础上实现区块链技术与立法的互动共治,微观层面应明确区块链系统参与者的法律地位、强化其应承担的法律义务和法律责任、健全删除权的救济规则和规范区块链技术的应用场景。In the background of digital economy,the block chain technology with non-erasability brings great challenges to the legal protection of personal information deletion right,it also reflects the value conflict between technology innovation,right protection and technology ethics.Facing the conflict and responding to the challenge is the best choice for legislation.It is necessary to resolve the conflict between the technology of blockchain and the legislation of deletion right at the two levels of macrocosm and microcosm in order to better realize the information subject against the right of unlimited deletion in the background of blockchain technology.At the macro level,we ad⁃here to the idea of people-oriented and inclusive digital governance and realize the interactive co-governance of block chain technology and legislation,at the micro level,we should make clear the legal status of the participants of blockchain system,strengthen their legal obligations and responsibilities,perfect the remedy rules of deletion right and standardize the application of blockchain technology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.65