故意杀人罪基准刑研究--以重庆市132个案例为分析样本  

Study on the Baseline Punishment of Intentional Homicide:Taking 132 Cases in Chongqing as the Analysis Sample

作　　者：赵金文 冉金 ZHAO Jin-wen;RAN Jin(Human Rights Research Institute,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China;Chongqing Daolun Law Firm,Chongqing 400000,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学人权研究院,重庆401120 [2]重庆道伦律师事务所,重庆400000

出　　处：《重庆工商大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期163-176,共14页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：为确保量刑均衡,最高人民法院、最高人民检察院出台了《关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见(试行)》等规范性文件。由于《关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见(试行)》未明确基准刑内涵,基准刑裁量规则缺乏明确性、可操作性,故意杀人罪量刑存在失衡现象。为弥补此缺憾,在厘清故意杀人罪基准刑内涵基础上,以重庆市132个案例为分析样本,对司法案例中量刑结果与基准刑裁量情节相关关系进行实证分析,揭示其中规律,进而构建故意杀人罪基准刑裁量模型。In order to ensure the balance of sentencing,the Supreme People’s Court and Procuratorate issued normative documents,such as Sentencing Guideline for Common Crimes(Trial)does not clarify the connotation of the baseline punishment,and the baseline punishment discretion rules are lack of clarity and operability,so the sentencing of intentional homicide is unbalanced.Therefore,in order to make up for this deficiency,on the basis of clarifying the connotation of benchmark punishment,this paper takes 132 cases in Chongqing as the analysis sample to empirically analyze the correlation between sentencing results and the circumstances of baseline punishment discretion,so as to construct the baseline punishment discretion model of intentional homicide.

关 键 词：基准刑 故意杀人罪 量刑均衡 量刑情节 刑罚 

分 类 号：D924.34[政治法律—刑法学]