關於金太祖的一則佚史——兼論金朝修史的改篡問題  

A Lost Historical Record about Emperor Taizu of the Jin Dynasty:Concurrently Discuss on the Problem of Falsifying History in the Jin Dynasty

作　　者：邱靖嘉 李京澤 Qiu Jingjia;Li Jingze

机构地区：[1]中國人民大學歷史學院

出　　处：《中华文史论丛》2021年第4期259-285,406,共28页Journal of Chinese Literature and History

基　　金：國家社會科學基金一般項目“北族王朝歷史書寫視野下的金朝開國史研究”(21BZS057)階段性成果。

摘　　要：《三朝北盟會編》卷一八引苗耀《神麓記》記有一則金太祖阿骨打的生平簡史,其内容多不見於《金史·太祖紀》,可能源出金朝史館的早期修史素材,具有獨特的史料價值。其謂遼天慶四年阿骨打於寧江州"拜天册立,改元,稱帝號",提供了一種與《金史》記載不同的開國史敍述版本,且其所記阿骨打死事亦有别於《金史》,它們均有助於説明金朝官方修史過程中存在的史事改篡問題。這就提示我們研讀《金史》需注意參考其他宋元文獻記載仔細辨析,以發現那些有可能被金人隱匿的真相。Miao Yao’s work Shenlu Record quoted by the Compilation of the Three Dynasties Confederating to the North has kept a lost historical record about Emperor Taizu of the Jin Dynasty.Its details are not seen in the Imperial Annals of Emperor Taizu in Jin Shi.Probably they came from the early historical materials of the Jin dynasty’s historiography Institute,so that have unique historical value.It said that A gu da declared himself emperor in Ningjiang prefecture in the fourth year of Tianqing in the Liao dynasty,which provides a different version of the founding history from Jin Shi,and its record of A gu da’s death is also distinctive.They all help to explain the problem of falsifying history existing in the historiography of the Jin dynasty.It reminds us that when studying Jin Shi,we should pay attention to the analysis of the records by referring to other Song and Yuan documents,so as to find the truth that may be hidden by the Jin’s historiographers.

关 键 词：金太祖 阿骨打 《神麓記》 金朝修史 改篡問題 

分 类 号：K246.4[历史地理—历史学] K827[历史地理—中国史]