检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田世野 李萍[1] TIAN Shiye;LI Ping
出 处:《学术月刊》2021年第12期74-84,共11页Academic Monthly
基 金:国家社会科学基金西部项目“基于农村集体资产股权量化改革的农民收入增长机制研究”(2017XJY015)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:基于宏观、历史和系统的马克思主义产权理论范式,我们尝试建立一种理解中国农村土地产权制度变迁的发展视角。在这一视角下,新中国成立以来中国农村土地产权制度的变迁,是适应农业农村农民职能定位历史性变迁的制度重构过程;是适应中国发展阶段、发展方式和集体经济职能转型,重塑国家、集体和农民关系的过程;是对发展过程中农村土地双重职能动态演变的适应性调整过程;是包含农村土地产权的实现机制,在发展基础上通过配套改革实现从法律权利到经济权利转变的系统演进过程。在对发展的解释上,西方产权理论的核心观点-私有产权有效论和公有产权无效论,本质上是一种高度意识形态化的西方叙事,既不符合共同富裕的社会主义价值取向,也不能客观地揭示产权和发展之间多维、动态的复杂关联。这些根本缺陷使得西方产权理论不可能深刻理解中国农村土地产权制度变迁和"中国式现代化"的真实逻辑。讲好改革和发展的"中国故事",必须在马克思主义产权理论指导下,结合中国自身实践,加强发展视角下的产权研究,推进中国特色社会主义产权理论的创新发展。Based on the macroscopical, historical and systematic Marxist property rights theory paradigm,we try to establish a development perspective to understand the changes of rural land property rights system in China. From this perspective, the change of rural land property rights system since the founding of new China is a process of institutional reconstruction to adapt to the historical change of agricultural and rural farmers’ function orientation. It is a process of adapting to China’s development stage, development mode and collective economic function transformation, and reshaping the relationship among the state, the collective and the farmers. It is an adaptive adjustment process for the dynamic evolution of the dual functions of rural land in the development process;and a systematic evolution process to realize the transformation from legal rights to economic rights through supporting reforms on the basis of development which includes the realization of rural land property rights. In the interpretation of development, the core view of western property rights theory, " the validity of private property rights"and "the invalidity of public property rights", is essentially a highly ideological Western narrative, neither conforms to the socialist value orientation of common prosperity, nor objectively reveals the multidimensional and dynamic complex relation between property rights and development. These fundamental defects make it impossible for western property rights theory to deeply understand the real logic of China’s rural land property rights system changes and "Chinese-style modernization". In order to tell a good " Chinese story" of reform and development, guided by the Marxist theory of property and combined with China’ s own practice, we must strengthen the research on property rights from the perspective of development, and promote the innovative development of the socialist property rights theory with Chinese characteristics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7