检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟天一 张玉[1,2] 刘瑾 赵阳 杨倩 丁潇[1] 范特佳 MENG Tianyi;ZHANG Yu;LIU Jin;ZHAO Yang;YANG Qian;DING Xiao;FAN Tejia(Civil and Architecture Engineering, Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an 710021, P. R. China;Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Loess Mechanics and Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, P. R. China)
机构地区:[1]西安工业大学建筑工程学院,西安710032 [2]西安理工大学陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室,西安710048
出 处:《土木与环境工程学报(中英文)》2022年第1期20-27,共8页Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金(11802218);陕西省科技计划(2019JQ-432);陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室项目(LME201801);陕西省教育厅专项科研计划(19JK0399、20JK0670)。
摘 要:针对实际工程中大量存在的挡土墙、基坑开挖等平面应变问题,考虑中主应力对强度的影响,将平面应变条件下Lade-Duncan强度准则的中主应力关系代入SMP、Lade-Duncan、AC-SMP和广义Mises强度准则中得到新的平面应变强度准则。据此建立基于各强度准则的主、被动土压力计算公式,进而推广至黏性土,并将主、被动土压力理论计算值与实测值进行对比分析。结果表明,Mohr-Coulomb强度准则因其未考虑中主应力的影响,致使计算结果相比实测情况偏保守;SMP强度准则、Lade-Duncan强度准则考虑到中主应力对土压力大小的影响,计算结果相比Mohr-Coulomb强度准则更接近实测情况;AC-SMP强度准则、广义Mises强度准则在一定内摩擦角范围内可以描述挡土墙的土压力大小,但超出适用范围时,二者均不再适用于描述挡土墙的土压力大小;广义Mises强度准则在适用范围内的计算结果相比SMP强度准则、Lade-Duncan强度准则更接近实测数据。In the engineering practice,the retaining wall and foundation pit could be regarded as a plane strain condition.Considering the influence of intermediate principal stess on the strength,we obtained the new plane strain strength criterions by substituting the intermediate principal stress relationship of Lade-Duncan strength criterion into SMP and Lade-Duncan,AC-SMP and the generalized Mises strength criterion.Based on these modified strength criterions,active and passive earth pressure models were established,and then extended to cohesive soil.The theoretical and measured values were compared and analyzed.The results show that the effect of intermediate principal stress on earth pressure is significant.The Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion fails to consider the influence of intermediate principal stress,and therefore the calculation results are more conservative than measurement.Considering the influence of the principal stress,the results of SMP and Lade-Duncan strength criterion are much closer to measurement than MC.The AC-SMP and generalized Mises strength criterion can describe the earth pressure of the retaining wall only within a certain range of friction angle,but when it exceeds the applicable range,both are no longer suitable.The calculations of the generalized Mises strength criterion,within the applicable range,are closer to actual data compared with the SMP and Lade-Duncan strength criterion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200