三十年来我国图书馆著作权侵权案件分析及应对策略研究  

Research on the Analysis and Strategy of Library Copyright Infringement Cases in China over the Past Thirty Years

作　　者：巫慧 Wu Hui

机构地区：[1]东莞城市学院图书馆 [2]澳门科技大学法学院

出　　处：《国家图书馆学刊》2021年第6期22-32,共11页Journal of The National Library of China

基　　金：东莞理工学院城市学院青年教师发展基金重点项目“著作权转换性使用的本土化适用研究”(项目编号:2019QJZ003R)研究成果。

摘　　要：三十年来我国图书馆著作权侵权案件的裁判文书显示,图书馆在涉嫌数字资源侵权时援引"合理使用"往往不被法院认可,在共同侵权纠纷中,图书馆作为直接侵权人更是难以成功抗辩。依据从1348篇裁判文书中选取的8组典型案件裁判的比较分析,在"合理使用"难以有效适用的现状下,图书馆援引合法授权抗辩、权属抗辩、避风港规则抗辩、时效抗辩的抗辩事由更易为法院采纳从而免于承担侵权责任;在提供内容服务时履行更高的注意义务,周密审查数字资源供应商的授权基础,则能使图书馆在著作权侵权诉讼中免于被判共同侵权。表4。参考文献8。The adjudicative document of library copyright infringement cases in China over the past thirty years show that in the infringement cases involved with digital resources,fair use put forward by the library is normally excluded by courts.Moreover,in cases with joint torts,the library usually would not find infringement defenses which can be accepted by courts.Based on the analysis of the 8 groups of typical cases selected from the 1348 pieces of adjudicative documents,since fair use can’t be applied in digital environment,the defenses such as duly authorization,ownership defense,safe harbour rule,and action limitation defense proposed by the library are accepted by courts easily and the librany won’t be held reponsible.In addition,when acting as an internet content provider,the library exercising a duty of carewith higher level to carefully investigate the authorization basis from the digital-resource supplier can keep itself from being ruled infringed for joint torts in copyright infringement.4 tabs.8 refs.

关 键 词：图书馆 著作权侵权 司法裁判 抗辩事由 

分 类 号：G259.2[文化科学—图书馆学] D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]