文书提出义务之实体法配套规定的重要性  

Importance of Supporting Provisions of the Substantive Law of the Instrument Providing Obligations

作　　者：陈胜[1] 曾佳明 CHEN Sheng;ZENG Jia-ming(Law School,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou Fujian 350108)

机构地区：[1]福州大学法学院,福建福州350108

出　　处：《牡丹江大学学报》2022年第2期66-72,共7页Journal of Mudanjiang University

摘　　要：文书提出义务制度于2019年被最高人民法院司法解释加以细化规定。关于文书提出义务的理论研究屡见不鲜,但是该制度最亟待解决的是与实体法应然衔接的问题。文书提出义务实属民事诉讼诸多制度中成长较为初期一环,急需实体法规范配套及呼应。本文以理论基础为立足之本,论证实体法律规范的配套规定对于文书提出义务的重要性,明确了缺乏实体法规范制度就有可能产生实务问题,呼吁对该制度尽快形成体系化的实体法配套规定。The system of obligation put forward by the document was refined by the judicial interpretation of the Supreme people’s Court in 2019.The theoretical research on the obligation of the instrument is common,but the most urgent problem of the system is the connection with the substantive law.The obligation of the document is a relatively early part of the growth of many systems of civil litigation,and it is urgent to support and echo the substantive law norms.Based on the theoretical basis,this paper demonstrates the importance of the supporting provisions of the substantive legal norms to the obligations of the documents,and clarifies that the lack of the substantive law normative system may lead to practical problems.It is of great importance to call for the system as soon as possible to form a systematic substantive law supporting provisions.

关 键 词：文书提出义务 民事诉讼制度 实体法规范 

分 类 号：D922[政治法律—法学]