论我国地方立法中设定行政处罚存在的问题及对策  

On the Problems Existing in Administrative Punishment In Local Legislation In China and Countermeasures

作　　者：吕东锋[1] 罗江山 LYU Dong-feng;LUO Jiang-shan(School of Literature and Law,East China University of Technology,Nanchang 330013,China)

机构地区：[1]东华理工大学文法学院,江西南昌330013

出　　处：《东华理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第6期584-590,共7页Journal of East China University of Technology(Social Science)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务项目(中国特色社会主义理论体系研究)“改革开放四十年依法治国的理论演进与实践规律研究”(18JD710054);东华理工大学博士科研启动基金项目“中国授权立法制度研究”(DHBK2018087);东华理工大学生态文明建设研究院(江西生态文明建设制度研究中心)2021年开放基金项目“促进和保障生态文明建设的地方立法模式研究”(JXST2102)。

摘　　要：《行政处罚法》是地方立法设定行政处罚的主要依据。由于行政处罚种类单一、地方立法权限不足、"不抵触"原则把握不精准等原因,导致地方立法在设定行政处罚时,出现重复立法、突破《行政处罚法》规定的创设权限以及对处罚种类的运用不平衡的问题。为解决上述问题,在修法时,应围绕变更行政处罚种类的表达方式,适度扩大地方立法设定行政处罚的权限和厘清"不抵触"原则的判断标准三方面对其相关规定加以完善。Law of The People′s Republic of China on Administrative Penalty is the main basis for the establishment of administrative penalties by local legislation.The single type of administrative penalties,insufficient local legislative authority and inaccurate grasp of the principle of non-contravention have caused some problems in local legislation such as repeated legislation when setting administrative penalties,breaking through the creation powers stipulated in the Administrative Punishment Law and the unbalanced application of penalty types.In order to solve the above problems,when amending the law,we should improve the relevant regulations from three aspects:changing the expressions of the types of administrative penalties,appropriately expanding the power of local legislation to set administrative penalties and clarifying the judgment criteria of the non-contravention principle.

关 键 词：行政处罚 地方立法 立法权限 “不抵触”原则 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]