检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:亚当·S·波森 王宇(译)[2] Adam S.Posen;Wang Yu
机构地区:[1]美国彼得森国际经济研究所 [2]中国人民银行研究局
出 处:《金融发展研究》2022年第1期34-37,共4页Journal Of Financial Development Research
摘 要:在过去20多年的时间里,美国一直在进行着“去全球化”的各种努力,试图与世界经济脱钩。但并没有缓解美国的经济不公平、收入分配不公正以及贫富差距等问题,反而由于对美国企业的过多保护,使其远离国际市场和国际竞争,导致这些问题越来越严重。与此同时,美国对制造业的政策倾向是有失理性的,过分关注由贸易逆差而造成的制造业部门工作岗位流失,而不是关心对所有工人的冲击,这本就是一种不公平。事实上,受“去全球化”政策影响,美国服务业部门的低工资工人的数量已呈上升趋势。Over the past 20 years,the United States has been carrying out various efforts to"de-globalize",trying to decouple from the world economy.However,it has not alleviated the problems of economic inequity,inequitable income distribution,and the gap between the rich and the poor.On the contrary,the excessive protection of American companies has kept them away from the international market and international competition,and these problems have become more and more serious.At the same time,the U.S.policy toward manufacturing is irrational.It is unfair to pay too much attention to the loss of jobs in the manufacturing sector caused by the trade deficit,rather than to the impact on all workers.In fact,the number of low-wage workers in the U.S.service sector has been on the rise as a result of"de-globalization"policies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.232.123