字形讹混与古书校读——以“面”“而”“向”“回”为例  

The confusion between word forms and the collation of ancient literature:Taking mian(面),er(而),xiang(向)and hui(回)as examples

作　　者：董志翘 DONG Zhiqiao

机构地区：[1]北京语言大学文献语言学研究所/北京文献语言与文化传承研究基地,北京

出　　处：《中国语文》2022年第1期96-105,128,共11页Studies of the Chinese Language

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目《中古汉语虚词研究及中古汉语虚词词典编撰》(18AYY020)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：古代文献在历代传抄镌刻过程中,因字形相近而讹者触处可见。有时因一字之讹而使文意百思不得其解,或致千百年来众说纷纭、莫衷一是。故排比历代字讹的实例,总结一些历代字讹的规律,有时可以取得举一反三的效应,是我们做好古籍整理工作的一项重要任务。本文基于古文献中“面(靣)”“而”“向”“回”四字字形相近,经常互讹这一认识,对古文献中几个疑难问题作出考释。Misuses caused by the similarity between word forms can be seen almost everywhere in historical copies and inscriptions of ancient literature.This may lead to confusion on the interpretation of texts and result in disagreement between scholars.Thus,listing and analyzing the misuses of words in ancient literature and summing up their regularities is a significant task.This paper offers annotations on four characters which are often misused for each other clue to their similarity in shape,the mian(面),er(而),xiang(向)and hui(回),in order to resolve some problematic issues on the comprehension of ancient literature.

关 键 词：古文献 形近而讹 词语考释 

分 类 号：H131[语言文字—汉语] H124[文化科学—图书馆学] G256