检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王淑君[1] WANG Shu-jun(Shandong Youth University of Political Science,Jinan 250014,China)
出 处:《佳木斯大学社会科学学报》2022年第1期221-224,共4页Journal of Social Science of Jiamusi University
摘 要:近年来我国高校外语教学取得了长足进步和发展,但仍面临很多挑战,其中评价体系单一是个突出问题。作为语言综合技能的重要组成部分,阅读能力亟需科学、合理的评价手段。鉴于档案袋评价法和外语阅读学习特点的高契合度,将其应用于阅读能力评价在理论上具有较高信度和效度。本文通过对一所大学德、韩语专业学生展开的实证研究表明,档案袋评价法对阅读能力的提高有促进效应,但某些不确定因素使其存在一定局限性,这为将来的研究留下了广阔空间。Tremendous achievements and progress have been witnessed in Chinese college foreign language teaching in recent years while it is still faced with many challenges,the most striking problem of which is its current monotonous evaluative system. As a significant component of language comprehensive competence,reading proficiency is supposed to be evaluated in a scientific and reasonable way. Owing to great fitness between portfolios and foreign language reading,portfolio assessment bears high reliability and validity in reading proficiency evaluation theoretically. An empirical study with Germany-majors and Korean-majors as samples in a college shows that portfolio assessment proves to be very effective for reading proficiency improvement. Meanwhile,uncertain factors pose some limitations for portfolios in practice,which makes spacious room for future studies.
分 类 号:G642.4[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49