论滥用管辖救济的合理规制  

On the Reasonable Regulation of Abuse of Jurisdiction Relief

作　　者：马丁[1] Ma Ding

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院

出　　处：《法治现代化研究》2021年第6期168-183,共16页Law and Modernization

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“诉与民事实体权利之间关系的理论及其应用研究”(18BFX067)的研究成果。

摘　　要：管辖权异议以及对驳回异议的上诉是司法制度赋予当事人的基本程序救济权利。因为制度设计未尽合理以及法律职业伦理和社会诚信的欠缺,导致管辖救济在实践中存在严重的滥用现象。对此的确有进行应对的现实必要性,在司法实践中也已出现多种尝试。但规制方式各异以及缺乏正当性考量和合理性考量又构成新问题。对滥用管辖救济的行为应当予以专门规制。一方面需要将惩处的发动、实施、救济有机融入管辖救济程序中;另一方面需要确保惩处的合理性,特别要做到对当事人的恶意从严判断以及罚当其错。通过在程序和内容方面对规制的完善和提升,可望维系管辖救济顺利开展和有效规制滥用行为之间的有机平衡。Jurisdiction objections and appeals to reject such objections are the basic procedural remedies granted to the parties by the judicial system.Because of the imperfect system design and the lack of legal professional ethics and social integrity,there is a serious abuse of jurisdictional relief in practice.There is a real necessity to deal with this problem,and many attempts have been made in judicial practice.However,different regulatory methods and lack of consideration of legitimacy and rationality pose new problems.Therefore,the abuse of jurisdictional relief should be specifically regulated.On the one hand,it is necessary to integrate the initiation,implementation,and relief of punishment into the jurisdictional relief procedure.On the other hand,it is necessary to ensure the rationality of the punishment,especially to judge the maliciousness of the parties strictly and to punish them accordingly.The enrichment and improvement of regulations in terms of procedures and content is expected to maintain an organic balance between the smooth development of jurisdictional relief and the effective constraints on the abuse of such a right.

关 键 词：管辖权异议 上诉 权利滥用 诚实信用原则 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]