网络淫秽表演的刑法适用分析  

Analysis on the Application of Criminal Law to Network Obscene Performance

作　　者：赵天水[1] ZHAO Tianshui(School of Law,Tianjin University of Finance and Economics,Tianjin 300222,China)

机构地区：[1]天津财经大学法学院,天津300222

出　　处：《重庆邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期61-69,共9页Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题:涉外网络犯罪刑事管辖权研究(GJ2021D27)。

摘　　要：网络淫秽表演的司法适用存在乱象,类案不类判现象严重,对其进行研究旨在保障案件处理的公正性。祛除上述乱象的根本在于采用法教义学方法界定网络淫秽表演的性质,分析其究竟是“淫乱”“淫秽物品”还是“淫秽表演”。对于私密性的淫秽表演,不能认定为聚众淫乱罪,而应以公然性淫秽表演为判断前提。司法案例确认了“网络淫秽表演是淫秽物品”的裁判要旨,阐明“淫秽物品”应同时具有淫秽性和传播性特征。有案例说明实践中存在随意解释“淫秽表演”之嫌,使得组织淫秽表演罪的内涵不当扩张。另外,私密性聚众淫秽表演有成立传播淫秽物品(牟利)罪的解释空间,公然性聚众淫秽表演的司法适用应结合案件具体情形进行判定。The judicial applications of network obscene performances are chaos,which similar cases cannot get similar judgments.The research on it aims to ensure the fairness of case handling.The fundamental way to eliminate the above confusion is to define the nature of the network obscene performance with the method of legal dogma and analyze whether it is“outstanding”,“obscene items”or“obscene performance”.For obscene performances of privacy,it cannot be considered as gathering fornication,which is based on the premise of public obscene performance.The judicial case confirmed the referee of“online obscene performance is an obscene item”.“Obscene items”should have two characteristics at the same time,which is obscenity and propagation.Some cases show that there exists the suspicion of interpreting“obscene performance”at will in practice,which makes the connotation of the offence of organizing obscenity performance expand improperly.In addition,private sexual intercourse in some cases constitutes the offence of spreading obscene items(for profit).The judicial applicable to the public gathering obscene performance should be determined in conjunction with specific cases.

关 键 词：网络淫秽表演 组织淫秽表演罪 传播淫秽物品罪 聚众淫乱罪 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]