检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑慧萌 ZHENG Huimeng(China University of Petroleum Qingdao,Shandong 266580)
出 处:《中国商论》2022年第3期55-58,共4页China Journal of Commerce
摘 要:农业是我国的民生之本。随着电商平台的迅速发展,电商农业供应链金融为解决"三农"问题提供了新思路、新方法。本文以"农业企业+农户+金融机构+电商平台"模式为例,基于Stacklberg博弈模型,通过比较集中决策与分散决策下电商农业供应链中两两主体间的最优利润差异,分析供应链各主体间的利润状况,实现收益共享。研究结果表明,当一方利润差异为负时,可由获得额外收益主体与亏损主体共享其收益,从而激励博弈各方合作,实现整体供应链条的收益最大化。Agriculture is the foundation of China’s people livelihood. With the rapid development of e-commerce platforms, e-commerce agricultural supply chain finance provides new ideas and methods to solve the problems of "agriculture, rural areas and farmers". Based on the Stacklberg game model, taking the mode of "agricultural enterprises+farmers+financial institutions+e-commerce platform" as an example, by comparing the optimal profit difference between two subjects in the e-commerce agricultural supply chain under centralized decision-making and decentralized decision-making, this paper analyzes the profit status of each subject in the supply chain to realize revenue sharing. The results show that when one side’s profit difference is negative, the extra profit that the player gets can be shared with the player who loses, so as to encourage the players to cooperate and realize the profit maximization of the whole supply chain.
关 键 词:Stacklberg博弈 供应链金融 电商农业供应链 收益共享 运营决策
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.247.50