检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高斌 Gao Bin
机构地区:[1]江苏科技大学图书馆
出 处:《图书馆学研究》2021年第24期52-68,共17页Research on Library Science
摘 要:MARC一直是图书情报界重要的信息交换标准,由于格式老旧,难以被图情界以外的领域熟知与使用,因此阻碍了MARC的应用。随着语义网的发展,关联数据技术已被图情界视为构建书目信息的一项新方法。有鉴于此,重新审视MARC采取何种方式扩展至关联数据与其产生效益是值得研究的课题。首先,以关联数据提出的2006年为基准,分析相关MARC提案与讨论文件的内容及相关的关联数据应对方式。再者,选取两笔MARC书目记录与一份MARC提案文件引出8个事例,导入BIBFRAME与RDA两项书目实体作为使用案例,以实证与解释MARC延展为关联数据的方式。结果证明:MARC已成功融合资源描述框架与结构,同时也是关联数据交换标准。最后,讨论MARC提案文件中所定义的书目实体等相关议题。MARC has been accepted as a standard format for information interchange in libraries for decades.Owing to the outdated format, MARC is unknown and unused outside of libraries.Moving to the era of semantic web, the technology of linked data(LD) is regarded as a new approach to deconstruct library bibliographic data(LBD) into LD for libraries.It is deserved to examine what approach has been adopted to extend MARC into LD and its potential benefits.This study has analyzed MARC proposals and discussion papers related to LD as a basis to investigate what changes have been approved for MARC since 2006 of the LD initiative.Furthermore, eight use cases selected from two MARC records and an instance of one MARC proposal respectively were employed to address how MARC changes have been transformed MARC-based LBD into LD in practice by combining classes and properties of BIBFRAME and RDA bibliographic ontology.Consequently, it reveals that RDF’s triplification has been integrated as part of MARC successfully.Therefore, MARC is not only a standard for communication and representation of bibliographic and related information, but also one for LD in libraries.Related issues to fundamental definition of bibliographic entity defined in MARC proposals for LD have also discussed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.170.222