检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李青[1] LI Qing(Anhui University of Technology,Maanshan 243002,China)
出 处:《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2022年第1期5-8,80,共5页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
基 金:安徽高校人文社会科学研究重点项目“反垄断法中协同行为认定的难点与应对研究”(项目编号:SK2020A0169)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:为弥补专利法强制许可保护竞争的不足,德国学界与法院认可了反垄断法上专利强制许可的存在,进而在司法实践中发展出专利强制许可抗辩。专利强制许可抗辩的本质是一种特殊的利益平衡路径,不仅可协调反垄断法与知识产权法的紧张关系,有效保证专利权人与需求人之间的利益平衡,且有利于诉讼成本的节省。从权利保护的及时性及竞争秩序维护的必要性角度出发,我国应采纳专利强制许可抗辩,并完成要件的厘清。In order to make up for the deficiency of compulsory license protection competition in the Patent Law,German academic circles and courts have recognized the existence of compulsory license in the Antitrust law,and developed compulsory license defense in judicial practice.Its nature is a special interest balance path,which can not only coordinate the tension between Antitrust Law and Intellectual Property Law,but also effectively guarantee the interest balance between the patentee and the demander,helping to save the litigation cost.From the point of view of the timeliness of right protection and the necessity of maintaining competition order,China should adopt compulsory patent license defense and complete the clarification of the requirements.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7