检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡剑波[1] 许帅 Hu Jianbo;Xu Shuai(School of Economics,Guizhou University of Finance and Economics,Guiyang 550025,China)
出 处:《统计与决策》2022年第3期65-70,共6页Statistics & Decision
基 金:贵州省哲学社会科学规划重点课题(20GZZD62);贵州财经大学在校学生科学研究项目(2020ZXSY40)。
摘 要:为探究中国产业部门在环境影响下的综合发展绩效,文章基于2002—2017年中国投入产出数据,利用三阶段DEA模型和Malmquist指数对我国产业部门环境效率及环境全要素生产率进行测度。结果发现:(1)剔除外部环境因素后的中国产业部门环境效率有所上升,但其潜在提升空间仍然较大。(2)2002—2017年中国产业部门的环境改善潜力主要来源于SO_(2)减排潜力,建筑业、交通运输、仓储及邮政业等产业部门的环境改善潜力较高。(3)中国产业部门环境全要素生产率的增长动力主要来源于技术因素,其他服务业的环境全要素生产率增长高达59%。In order to explore the comprehensive development performance of China’s industrial sectors under environmental impact, this paper is based on China’s input-output data from 2002 to 2017 and uses three-stage DEA model and Malmquist index to measure the environmental efficiency and environmental total factor productivity(TFP) of China’s industrial sectors. The results are shown as follows:(1) The environmental efficiency of China’s industrial sectors has increased after excluding external environmental factors, but there is still a large potential for improvement.(2) The environmental improvement potential of China’s industrial sectors from 2002 to 2017 mainly came from the SO_(2)emission reduction potential, and the environmental improvement potential of construction, transportation, storage and postal industry is higher.(3) The growth power of environmental total factor productivity in China’s industrial sectors is mainly from technological factors, while the growth of environmental total factor productivity in other service industries is as high as 59%.
关 键 词:环境效率 环境全要素生产率 非竞争型投入产出模型 三阶段超效率SBM-DEA模型
分 类 号:F062.9[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.130