体育的历史生成——“体育基本原理”基于教材文本的学科反思  

Historical Formation of Sports ——Subject Reflections on "Sports Fundamentals"Based on Textbooks

作　　者：王广虎[1] 冉学东[1] WANG Guanghu;RAN Xuedong(Chengdu Sport University,Chengdu Sichuan 610041)

机构地区：[1]成都体育学院,四川成都610041

出　　处：《成都体育学院学报》2022年第1期29-38,共10页Journal of Chengdu Sport University

基　　金：国家社科基金“加快构建中国特色哲学社会科学学科体系、学术体系、话语体系”研究专项项目“新时代中国特色体育学基本理论问题研究”(19VXK10)。

摘　　要：体育作为人类社会一项相对独立的人的活动,是历史的产物。因此,"体育基本原理"的教材编写,应以历史唯物主义为指导,立足人类社会发展的历史进程,纳入人的活动分化的历史视野,在充分认识体育历史生成的历史条件和历史意义的基础上,明确体育的活动对象、活动本质、活动特征,从而使体育的认识达成历史的和逻辑的一致性。但回顾"体育基本原理"教材编写的百余年历史,虽经历了以"原理"为文本标识、以"理论"为文本标识、以"概论"为文本标识、以"基本"为文本取向的不同阶段,却与这一要求相距甚远。进入新文科建设的新时期,"体育基本原理"的教材编写和学科建设,应重视:自身自然——基于本体论的对象认识;工业革命——基于认识论的动因辨析;人的活动——基于方法论的特征解析。Sports, as a relatively independent human activity in human society, is a product of history. Therefore, the compilation of Basic Principles of Physical Education should clarify the object, nature, and characteristics of sports activities based on a full understanding of the historical conditions and significance of the formation of sports history, and achieve the historical and logical consistency in understanding sports by taking historical materialism as its guidance, the historical development of human society as its basis, and human activity divergence as its perspective. However, the compilation of Basic Principles of Physical Education in more than 100 years is far from meeting the goal, although it underwent changes in text labels from "principle", through "theory" and "concept" to "fundamentals" in different historical periods. In the new era of new liberal arts construction, the compilation of Basic Principles of Physical Education should attach importance to: intrinsic nature-cognition of objects based on ontology;industrial revolution-analysis of motivation based on epistemology;human activities-analysis of characteristics based on methodology.

关 键 词：体育 历史 基本原理 人的活动 自身自然 工业革命 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]