体育基金会财产归属及立法选择——基于公益信托法人的构想  

Sports foundation property ownership and legislative choice ——Based on the concept of public trust legal person

作　　者：张文阁 ZHANG Wenge(Dalian Maritime University,Dalian Liaoning 116026)

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《成都体育学院学报》2022年第1期73-78,共6页Journal of Chengdu Sport University

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“民法精神与建设社会主义法治文化民本模式研究”(14ZDC022)。

摘　　要：体育基金会财产归属在既有立法上未明确规定,因而使财产价值和功能得不到清晰的法律定位。尽管《民法总则》将基金会的法律地位列为非营利法人,但此种法人类型根本无法体现体育基金会应有的价值张力和公益信托功能,在《信托法》等特别法中更是宏观性的以公益类的行为列举和社会团体表达。在该情况下,为了最大化地体现体育基金会的公益价值张力和财产信托功能,明确其财产归属,立法应该选择符合体育基金会的具体法人类型。因此,体育基金会的法人地位和财产归属要在法律体系上实现协调,特别法上的立法表达应该是:体育基金会为非营利性的公益信托法人,享有法人财产所有权。The property ownership of sports foundation is not clearly defined in the existing legislation, so the property value and function cannot be clearly defined by law. Although the general provisions of the civil law listed the legal status of foundations as non-profit legal persons, such legal persons could not reflect the value tension and public trust function of sports foundations. In the special laws such as the trust law, they were listed and expressed by public welfare behaviors and social organizations in a macroscopic way. In this case, in order to maximize the public value tension and property trust function of sports foundation, and to clarify its property ownership, the legislation should choose the specific legal person type that conforms to sports foundation. Therefore, the legal person status and property ownership of sports foundation should be coordinated in the legal system, and the legislative expression in the special law should be: sports foundation is a non-profit public trust legal person and enjoys the property ownership of the legal person.

关 键 词：体育基金会 财产归属 立法选择 公益信托 

分 类 号：G80-052[文化科学—运动人体科学]