检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵利荣 周一兵 ZHAO Lirong;ZHOU Yibing(Department of Radiotherapy,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University,Chongqing 400037,China)
机构地区:[1]陆军军医大学第二附属医院肿瘤科,重庆400037
出 处:《中国医疗设备》2022年第2期47-50,共4页China Medical Devices
基 金:重庆市技术创新与应用发展专项项目(cstc2019jscxmsxmX0265)。
摘 要:目的采用苏州雷泰公司的电子射野影像系统(Image Verification System,IVS),探讨三种不同的感兴趣体积(Volume of Interest,VOI)配准范围在腹部肿瘤摆位验证中配准精度的影响。方法分别获取盆腔仿真模体的定位图像和20组已知位置偏差的IVS图像进行配准,选取三种不同的VOI范围,得到三维平移方向的摆位误差,进行对比分析。结果选取配准范围VOI为35 cm×35cm×35 cm摆位误差最小。VOI为35 cm×35 cm×35 cm与VOI为25 cm×25 cm×25 cm和10 cm×10 cm×10 cm相比,x、y、z三个方向的摆位误差均具有明显的统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论对于盆腔部肿瘤而言,图像配准范围VOI建议选取35 cm×35 cm×35 cm配准结果的误差最小。Objective The effects of three different volume of interest(VOI)registration ranges on the accuracy of abdominal tumor placement verification were investigated by using image verification system(IVS)developed by Suzhou Reitel.Methods The positioning images of anthropomorphic pelvic phantom and 20 groups of IVS images with known position deviations were obtained for registration.Three different VOI ranges were selected to obtain the positioning errors of three-dimensional translation direction for comparative analyzed.Results The VOI of 35 cm×35 cm×35 cm was selected as the minimum positioning error.Compared with VOI of 25 cm×25 cm×25 cm×25 cm and 10 cm×10 cm×10 cm,the positioning errors in x,y and z directions had significant statistical differences(P<0.05).Conclusion For pelvic tumors,VOI of image registration range 35 cm×35 cm×35 cm is recommended to minimize the error of registration results.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.170.28