论龚鹏程的《文心雕龙》研究  

On GONG Pengcheng’s Study of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons

作　　者：王金龙[1] WANG Jinlong(Nanyang Normal University,Nanyang 473061,China)

机构地区：[1]南阳师范学院文学院,河南南阳473061

出　　处：《天中学刊》2022年第1期56-61,共6页Journal of Tianzhong

摘　　要：龚鹏程的《文心雕龙讲记》是他研究《文心雕龙》的总结之作,不仅包括了他之前的成果,而且进一步研究了目前"龙学"界的盲点和误判问题。作者视野宏阔,新见迭出,全书贯穿着极强的问题意识,而且环环相扣,每一讲解决一个问题。作者在批驳以前成果的同时,常常指出前人研究视域的盲点和研究方法的局限,主张把刘勰的文论放在中国文论、文学、文化的脉络传统中去整体研究。研究方法的独特性,加上作者深厚的学术功底,使得他的龙学研究极具冲击力。但作者把刘勰文论定位为经学传统下的文论的同时,又囿于儒学视域,从而混淆刘勰"征圣""宗经"的儒学立场和具体评判文学史上作家作品的实事求是原则。GONG Pengcheng’s Lecture on Wen Xin Diao Long is a summary of his study of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons.It not only includes his previous achievements,but also further studies of the blind spots and misjudgments.The author’s vision is broad and new ideas emerge one after another.Each lecture solves a big problem.When criticizing the previous achievements,the author often points out the blind spots and the limitations and advocates that LIU Xie’s literary theory should be studied as a whole in the context tradition of Chinese literary theory and culture.The uniqueness of research methods,coupled with the author’s deep academic foundation,makes his study have great impact.However,while positioning LIU Xie’s literary theory as the literary theory under the Confucian tradition,the author is limited to the perspective of Confucianism,which confuses LIU Xie ’s Confucian position and the principle of seeking truth from facts in the specific evaluation of writers’ works in the history of literature.

关 键 词：龚鹏程 《文心雕龙》 治学方法 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]