检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李建伟[1] LI Jianwei(Civil,Commercial and Economic Law School,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088
出 处:《山东科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第1期39-46,共8页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(20ZDA044)。
摘 要:公司集团化发展已成为主流态势,母公司少数股东不能查阅子公司文件资料将难以保障其知情权的实现。母公司股东查阅子公司的文件资料的障碍在于母、子公司法人人格独立之法理,但过度强调法理自洽,导致了司法实践中较为偏颇的利益失衡。我们可以借鉴美国、日本的股东查阅权穿越制度规则,从主体资格、主观限制、查阅对象以及查阅范围等方面来完善制度设计。Companies tend to develop towards collectivization.If minority shareholders of the parent company are unable to access the documents and materials of the subsidiaries,it is difficult to guarantee the realization of their right to know.The obstacle for the shareholders of the parent company to access the information of the subsidiaries lies in the legal principle of independent legal personality of the parent and subsidiary companies.However,excessive emphasis on self-consistency will lead to a more biased imbalance of interests in judicial practice.Therefore,we should learn from the legislation and practice of passing-through exercise of shareholders’inspection right in the United States and Japan,and improve the system in terms of subject qualification,subjective restriction,inspection object and scope.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7