版权滥用泛在之证伪  

Falsification of Widespread Copyright Abuse

作　　者：卢海君[1] 任寰 Lu Haijun;Ren Huan

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院 [2]对外经济贸易大学

出　　处：《知识产权》2022年第1期50-62,共13页Intellectual Property

基　　金：对外经济贸易大学“惠园杰出青年学者”计划资助,项目名称:“平台经济中的知识产权法律问题研究”。

摘　　要：版权本为法定垄断之权。通常而言,正常行使版权并不会构成版权滥用,更不可能构成垄断行为。文娱领域的个体作品具有很强的可替代性,对个体作品的版权行使极少会影响市场竞争。聚合一定量级版权的互联网内容平台是否构成垄断需要基于竞争法原理,结合文化产品的特殊属性进行个案判定。我国《著作权法》实施以来,虽然取得长足进步,但加强知识产权保护仍然是时代的主旋律,应当进一步加强版权保护工作,而不是无端限制权利的正常行使。在此背景下,《著作权法》不宜规定所谓“版权滥用原则”。《反垄断法》对版权行使也应保持谦抑,避免公权力对私权的过度侵蚀。Copyright is in essence a limited monopoly granted by copyright law.Generally speaking,the exercise of copyright itself cannot lead to copyright abuse,let alone monopoly.Individual works in the field of entertainment are highly substitutable,and the exercise of copyright on these works rarely affects competition.Whether the Internet platform that aggregates a certain amount of copyrighted works constitutes a monopoly needs to be determined case-by-case according to the competition law,while taking into account the special characteristics of cultural products.Although China has made great progress in copyright law since its implementation in decades,strengthening the protection of intellectual property remains the main issue at this stage.We should further strengthen the protection of copyright instead of restricting the normal exercise of copyright.In this context,it is inappropriate to stipulate the so-called"copyright abuse principle"in the copyright law.The antitrust law should also be enforced at a modest level to avoid the excessive damage to private rights from public power.

关 键 词：版权滥用 拒绝许可 相关市场 市场支配地位 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]