网络诽谤案件追诉难之成因与解决路径  

The Causes and Solutions of the Difficulty in Prosecuting Internet Defamation Cases

作　　者：李赫 LI He(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2022年第2期50-52,共3页Journal of Harbin University

摘　　要：将“严重危害社会秩序和国家利益”作为网络诽谤案件提起公诉的标准,并未从根本上解决被害人取证困难的问题。在职权主义背景下,赋予被害人调查取证权的可能性存疑。可以借鉴我国台湾地区将告诉权与证据收集相分离的做法,令亲告罪被害人自主选择“公诉”或“自诉”的追诉方式,完善大陆地区“告诉才处理”案件的刑事立法与司法实践。Taking“seriously endangering social order and national interests”as the standard of public prosecution in Internet defamation cases does not fundamentally solve the problem of victims’difficulty in obtaining evidence.In the context of authority doctrine,the possibility of giving victims the right to investigate and obtain evidence is questionable.We can learn from the practice of separating the right to tell from the collection of evidence in China’s Taiwan region,make the victims of personal accusation choose the way of prosecution of“public prosecution”or“private prosecution”,and improve the criminal legislation and judicial practice of“handling only after telling”cases in mainland China.

关 键 词：网络诽谤 诽谤罪 亲告罪 追诉模式 

分 类 号：D924.34[政治法律—刑法学]