百年来中国对韩国史学史研究的回顾与展望  

Retrospect and Prospect of Studies of Ancient Korean Historiography in China in the Past 100 Years

作　　者：孙卫国[1] 秦丽[1] Sun Weiguo;Qin Li

机构地区：[1]南开大学历史学院,300350

出　　处：《史学理论研究》2022年第1期143-150,I0003,共9页Historiography Bimonthly

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“中朝史学比较视野下的朝鲜王朝明史撰述研究”(项目编号:20CZS004)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：20世纪初,随着朝鲜汉籍陆续进入中国学术视野,中韩史学比较研究陆续展开,孟森、吴晗等史家作出了重要贡献。从1949年到1992年中韩建交前,中国大陆学界对韩国史学的关注较少,中国台湾出版了一批韩国史学史研究成果,延续和拓展了相关领域。1992年中韩建交对于中国韩国学的发展有至关重要的作用,在韩国史学史、中韩史学交流与比较等领域都有一批学术成果问世。回顾百余年来韩国史学史研究的历程,中国学术界的研究成果呈现如下特点:论文较多,专著较少;专题性、叙述性的评介较多,全面系统的论述较少;对韩国汉文史籍的关注较多,非汉文韩国史籍甚少;自说自话的论著较多,与韩国学术界的对话较少。针对这些问题,还需做更全面的努力,以推动韩国史学史研究。At the beginning of the twentieth century,Chinese classics printed in ancient Korea were introduced into China.Since then,comparative studies of Chinese and Korean historiography started to unfold.Historians such as Meng Sen and Wu Han made important contributions in this field.Political situations had great influence on the study of this topic from 1949 to 1992,before the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and South Korea.During this period,scholars in Taiwan,China,produced some pioneering works,which played a vital role in the development of Korean studies in Chinese academic circles after 1992.A review of studies of Korean historiography in China over the past 100 years shows the following characteristics in the results of Chinese academia there are a greater quantity of papers than monographs,of thematic and narrative reviews than comprehensive and theoretical discussions,more attention to Korean historical books in Chinese than non-Chinese Korean historical books,a greater quantity of self-talking monologues than dialogues with Korean academic circles.In view of these problems,scholars need to make more comprehensive efforts in order to further promote studies of Korean historiography in China.

关 键 词：史学交流 史学比较 韩国史学史 中韩关系史 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学] K093.126