检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭港归 黄锋 李国栋[1] GUO Gang-gui;HUANG Feng;LI Guo-dong(Xi’an University of Technology,Xi’an 710048,China)
机构地区:[1]西安理工大学,陕西西安710048
出 处:《云南水力发电》2022年第2期82-87,共6页Yunnan Water Power
摘 要:小底坡低弗劳德数泄洪洞空腔回水问题较为严重,某水电站溢洪洞存在类似问题。对该电站2号溢洪洞进行三维数值模拟分析,原方案1号掺气坎处存在大尺度积水层,堵塞通气孔而无法掺气。缓底坡下空腔回水受水舌冲击角、弗劳德数的影响较大,针对以上两类影响因素对该工程进行掺气坎体型优化。对优化方案进行模拟得出各水力要素,并与试验结果进行对比,验证掺气坎体型基本合理。Backwater in cavity of spillway tunnel with low Fr number on small slope is a serious problem,and similar problems exist in spillway tunnel of a hydropower station.In this paper,3-dimensional numerical simulation analysis is carried out for No.2 spillway tunnel of the hydropower station.In the original scheme,large-scale water accumulation exists at the No.1 aeration sill,which blockages the ventilation holes and is unable to be aerated.Backwater of cavity on gentle bottom slope is greatly affected by impact angle of jet and Fr number.Aiming at the above two factors,the shape of the aeration sill is optimized.In this paper,the optimization scheme is simulated to get each hydraulic element,and compared with the test results to verify that the shape of the doping sill is reasonable.
分 类 号:TV131.39[水利工程—水力学及河流动力学] TV651.3
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.136.254