跨境数据流动治理的国别模式及其反思  

Different Modes of Cross-border Data Flow Governance and Reflection

作　　者：王燕[1] WANG Yan

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学法学院

出　　处：《国际经贸探索》2022年第1期99-112,共14页International Economics and Trade Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(20&ZD061)。

摘　　要：跨境数据流动治理承载着保障国家网络安全、数据资源独立、保护个人隐私、促进数字经济等价值。美国、欧盟、中国分别基于商业利益导向、个人数据权保护、网络主权和国家安全利益形成了各具特色的跨境数据流动治理模式,根据本国需要采取不同程度的跨境数据流动限制措施。国家采纳不同的跨境数据流动治理模式源于数字安全技术及数字贸易利益全球分布的不均匀、国际法对网络和数据霸权主义规制的不足以及国家在多元价值之间的选择。不同跨境数据流动治理模式并不必然存在优劣之分,国家应在兼容并蓄、尊重主权的基础上开展合作,减少不必要的跨境数据流动限制措施。The governance of cross-border data flow bears the values of safeguarding national network security, ensuring data resource independency, protecting personal privacy and promoting digital economy. The United States, the European Union and China have established their own unique governance modes of cross-border data flow based on their concerns of commercial interests, personal data right protection, and network sovereignty and national security interests, and have adopted different cross-border data flow restriction measures to suit their needs. These different governance modes of cross-border data flow adopted by the countries derive from the global disequilibrium of digital security technology and digital trade interests, the deficiency of regulation on network and data hegemonism, and the choice of the countries among multiple values. Different governance modes of cross-border data flow are neither superior nor inferior to others necessarily. The countries should cooperate with each other on the basis of inclusiveness and respect for sovereignty to remove unnecessary cross-border data flow restriction measures.

关 键 词：跨境数据流动 治理 数据流动限制 数据主权 

分 类 号：D996[政治法律—经济法学]