检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔文卉 姜珂 陈怀超[1] CUI Wenhui;JIANG Ke;CHEN Huaichao(College of Economics and Management,Taiyuan University of Technology,Taiyuan,Shanxi 030024,China)
机构地区:[1]太原理工大学经济管理学院,山西省太原市030024
出 处:《中国煤炭》2022年第2期20-28,共9页China Coal
基 金:山西省高等学校哲学社会科学研究项目(2017315);山西省回国留学人员科研资助项目(2021-063)。
摘 要:为探究煤炭企业员工逆境商数对安全偏离行为的影响,引入调节焦点作为调节变量以及优势使用作为中介变量,对所获取的263份有效问卷进行实证分析。运用SPSS 26.0软件,使用层次回归分析方法,从逆境控制、逆境归因、逆境延伸和逆境忍耐4个维度分析了逆境商数对煤炭企业员工安全偏离行为的影响。结果表明,煤炭企业员工逆境商数对安全偏离行为有显著负向影响;调节焦点增强了逆境商数对安全偏离行为的负向影响;优势使用在逆境商数影响安全偏离行为过程中存在部分中介作用。In order to explore the influence of adversity quotient on safety deviation behaviors of employees in coal enterprises,regulatory focus was introduced as the adjustment variable and strengths use as the intermediary variable,and the 263 effective questionnaires obtained were empirically analyzed.Using SPSS 26.0 software and hierarchical regression analysis method,the influence of adversity quotient on safety deviation behaviors of employees in coal enterprises was analyzed from four dimensions:adversity control,adversity ownership,adversity extend and adversity endurance.The results showed that adversity quotient of employees in coal enterprises had a significant negative influence on their safety deviation behaviors;regulatory focus strengthened the negative influence of adversity quotient on safety deviation behaviors;strengths use played a part of the mediation role in the process of adversity quotient affecting safety deviation behaviors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.116