检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:盛国滨[1,2] 薛瑞冬 蔡玉梅[2] 田杨杨 SHENG Guobin;XUE Ruidong;CAI Yumei;TIAN Yangyang(Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine,Harbin 150040,China;The Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine,Harbin 150001,China)
机构地区:[1]黑龙江中医药大学,黑龙江哈尔滨150040 [2]黑龙江中医药大学附属第二医院,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
出 处:《中医药信息》2022年第2期64-68,共5页Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:教育部春晖计划项目(Z2005-2-15003);盛国滨名中医专家传承工作室项目(黑中科教便函〔2019〕1号);黑龙江中医药大学研究生创新科研项目(2020yjscx045)。
摘 要:目的:比较电针针刺经筋结点和电针针刺常规腧穴两种治疗方案治疗中风后痉挛期上肢肘关节痉挛性瘫痪的疗效。方法:将符合纳入标准的40例肘关节痉挛的患者,按入院的先后顺序随机分成电针针刺经筋结点组和电针针刺常规腧穴组,各20例,记录两组治疗前及治疗7、14、21、28 d后的肘关节活动度(ROM)、肌张力等级(MAS)、上肢Fugl-Meyer运动功能评分(FMA),并运用改良Ashworth法(MAS)评估两组的临床疗效。结果:治疗7、14、21、28 d后,电针针刺经筋结点组和电针针刺常规腧穴组ROM及FMA评分较同组治疗前均显著改善(P<0.01),治疗14、21、28 d后电针针刺经筋结点组ROM和FMA评分改善明显优于电针针刺常规腧穴组(P<0.05)。治疗14、21、28 d后,电针针刺经筋结点组和电针针刺常规腧穴组MAS评级较同组治疗前均降低(P<0.05),且治疗14、21、28 d后电针针刺经筋结点组MAS等级评级明显低于电针针刺常规腧穴组(P<0.05)。电针针刺经筋结点组总有效率为95%(19/20),电针针刺常规腧穴组总有效率为65%(13/20),两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:电针针刺经筋结点疗法在增大肘关节活动度、减轻上肢肌张力增高和改善上肢运动功能等方面优于电针针刺常规腧穴治疗。Objective:To compare the curative effect of electro-needling meridian sinew knot and electroneedling conventional acupoints in the treatment of post-stroke spasmodic paralysis of elbow joint.Methods:40 patients with elbow spasms were randomly divided into the study group(electro-needling meridian sinew knot)and the control group(electro-needling conventional acupoints),with 20 cases in each group.The ROM of elbow,MAS level and FMA score of upper limb were observed before the treatment,on 7 d,14 d,21 d and 28 d of the treatment.Modified Ashworth method(MAS)was used to assess the efficacy of both groups.Results:After 7 d,14 d,21 d,28 d of the treatment,the scores of ROM and FMA were significantly improved compared to those before the treatment in the two groups(P<0.01);of which the improvements were more significant in the study group than those in the control group after 14 d,21 d and 28 d of the treatment(P<0.05).The MAS rating was significantly decreased after 14 d,21 d and 28 d of the treatment compared to that before the treatment in the two groups(P<0.05);of which the decrease in the study group was more significant(P<0.05).The total effective rate was 95%(19/20)in the study group,which was significantly higher than 65%(13/20)in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Electro-needling meridian sinew knot is better than electro-needling conventional acupoints in terms of increasing elbow motion,reducing muscle tension and improving motor function of upper limb.
分 类 号:R246.6[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15