地方党组织全面引领治理现象的发生机制——以S市动拆迁实践为例  

An Explanation of the Party’s Overall Leading Governance——Based on a Case Study of the Relocation Policy in S City

作　　者：王磊 曾庆捷[2] Wang Lei;Zeng Qingjie

机构地区：[1]暨南大学公共管理学院/应急管理学院,广州510632 [2]复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院,上海200433

出　　处：《上海行政学院学报》2022年第1期51-64,共14页The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“协同治理视域下县级政府促进民营企业发展的政策机制研究”(19CZZ036)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：中国共产党是中国特色社会主义事业的领导核心。从公共政策层面看,地方党组织的领导既表现在宏观的政策决策上,如制定方针路线;也可体现在中微观的政策执行中,如全面引领治理过程。在制定方针路线与全面引领治理之间的行为选择中,地方党组织采取后一种行为方式的发生机制是什么?除受党的先进性、上级要求等因素影响外,通过对地方动迁政策实践的个案研究发现,由于复杂政策的"网络性"要求有效的协调制度,制度建构和运作需投入大量资源,而市场或行政机制下的执行方式存在资源投入不足和协调制度匮乏,导致地方治理陷入集体行动困境,进而催生地方党组织全面引领地方治理。基于党章党纪等初始制度,地方党组织得以动员大量资源,进而成功建构和运作内部协调制度和外部协调制度,并分别实现对政策执行主体、主客体之间和客体内部的关系协调,推动了地方善治。The Communist Party of China is the core of leadership for the cause of socialism with Chinese characteristics.From the perspective of public policy,party leadership is manifested in macro policy decisions and medium-and micro-policy implementation,for example,overall leading governance.What is the motivation and logic of the local party branch to adopt overall leading governance?Through a case study of S city’s relocation,we find that the“networking”of local governance requires effective coordination institution,but the construction and operation of the institution requires a large amount of resources.However,Local governance based on market or bureaucratic mechanisms lacks coordination resources and institution.On the contrary,with the help of CCP’s organizational network,discipline,etc.,local party committee has significant advantages in resource mobilization and institutional construction.Based on initial institution,local party branches are able to mobilize resources and construct and operate internal/external coordination institution,and then effectively coordinate the various stakeholders to promote local governance.

关 键 词：全面引领治理 地方党组织 资源动员 协调制度 

分 类 号：D221[政治法律—政治学] D227[政治法律—中共党史]