检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶宝先 王晶东 陈庆海 马澍 袁海燕 陈永金[1] 王浩[1] TAO Baoxian;WANG Jingdong;CHEN Qinghai;MA Shu;YUAN Haiyan;CHEN Yongjin;WANG Hao(College of Geography and Environment,Liaocheng University,Liaocheng 252059,China)
出 处:《生态学报》2022年第3期914-921,共8页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2020MD004);山东省本科高校教学改革研究项目(M2018X052);聊城大学实验技术研究项目(26322170123);聊城大学基金项目(318051430)。
摘 要:大气氮沉降增加能改变土壤养分可利用性,影响滨海湿地植物的养分再吸收。目前研究多关注氮沉降量对养分再吸收过程的影响,且研究集中于叶片,鲜有研究区分不同形态氮素对植物不同器官养分再吸收过程的影响。通过两年的野外控制实验,研究硝态氮、铵态氮添加对黄河三角洲滨海湿地芦苇(Phragmites australis)叶、茎养分再吸收效率的影响。结果表明:两类氮添加均显著增加叶、茎的氮、磷含量(P<0.001),增幅达32.74%-43.22%(氮)、30.91%-36.51%(磷)。叶片氮的再吸收效率为54.14%-67.66%,茎氮的再吸收效率为50.60%-62.85%。叶片磷的再吸收效率为56.80%-70.38%,茎磷的再吸收效率为77.43%-84.95%。两类氮添加均显著降低氮、磷的再吸收效率(P<0.001),但两类氮添加处理下的养分再吸收效率无差异。叶、茎氮的再吸收效率无差异,但茎磷的再吸收效率明显高于叶(P<0.01)。总之,氮添加降低芦苇对氮、磷的再吸收效率,且茎对养分的再吸收也具有不可忽略的贡献。Increased atmospheric nitrogen(N)deposition may adjust the nutrient resorption efficiency of the plant species in the coastal wetlands due to the changing of soil nutrients availability.Most studies concentrated on the nutrient resorption of the leaf,whereas the nutrient resorption of the non-leaf organs,such as culm,is still less known.Moreover,little attention is concentrated on differentiating the effects of nitrate and ammonium additions on nutrient resorption.In this study,an in situ experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of nitrate and ammonium additions on the nutrient resorption efficiency of leaf and culm for reed(Phragmites australis)in the coastal wetlands of the Yellow River Delta,China.Results showed that N additions increased the concentrations of N and phosphorus(P)in senesced organs,ranging from 32.71%to 43.22%for N,and ranging from 30.91%to 36.51%for P.The N resorption efficiency(NRE)ranged from 54.14%to 67.66%for the leaf and ranged from 50.60%to 62.85%for the culm.The P resorption efficiency(PRE)ranged from 56.80%to 70.38%for the leaf and ranged from 77.43%to 84.95%for the culm.Both two types of N addition had similar and negative effects on nutrient resorption efficiency(P<0.001).The NRE of leaf was similar to that of culm,whereas the culm had larger PRE than leaf(P<0.01).Overall,both N additions decreased the NRE and PRE of reed.Furthermore,the culm of reed had a non-negligible contribution to nutrient resorption.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40