《民法典》体系下被遗忘权价值衡平与规则构建  

The Value Balance and the Rule Construction of the Right to Be Forgotten Under the System of“Civil Code”

作　　者：于若兰 YU Ruolan(School of Law,Jinan University,Guangzhou Guangdong 510632,China)

机构地区：[1]暨南大学法学院,广州510632

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第6期68-76,共9页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

摘　　要：构建被遗忘权需前置讨论如何衡平与言论自由、社会公共安全、互联网产业经济发展等价值的冲突。《民法典》中“人身关系、财产关系”所凸显的价值层次为被遗忘权与产业经济发展冲突提供了衡平路径。被遗忘权与言论自由、社会公共安全的价值冲突需通过“比例原则”来调整。“比例原则”应用的难点在于如何比较保留信息与删除信息所维护的利益孰大孰小,故在进行被遗忘权规则构建时,应当细分场景,在“比例原则”的指引下以“价值周期”凸显“信息过时”,以将被遗忘权建立在符合合理预期的基础上。Constructing the right to be forgotten requires a pre-discussion on how to balance the value conflicts with freedom of speech,public security,and the economic development of the internet industry.The value level highlighted by the“personal relationship and property relationship”in the“Civil Code”provides a balanced path for the conflict between the right to be forgotten and the development of industrial economy.“The proportion principle”is an essential way to adjust the value conflicts between the right to be forgotten and freedom of speech,as well as public security.The difficulty in application of“the proportion principle”lies in how to weigh the benefits from retaining information against deleting information.Therefore,when constructing the right to be forgotten rules,it is necessary to subdivide the scenarios,and use the“value cycle”to highlight the“information obsolescence”under the guidance of“the proportion principle”.Then the right to be forgotten could be established on the a base of reasonable expectation.

关 键 词：被遗忘权 比例原则 信息场景 价值周期 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]