检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹柠梦 孙炳海[1] 任梓荣 缪润润 乐国安 CAO Ning-meng;SUN Bing-hai;REN Zi-rong;MU Run-run;YUE Guo-an(College of Teacher Education,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua,Zhejiang 321004,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江师范大学教师教育学院,浙江金华321004
出 处:《应用心理学》2022年第1期73-79,共7页Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA165)。
摘 要:研究聚焦政府宣传教育,考察公众政治参与和地方政府信任的关系。对2061名有效被试进行问卷调查并分析。结果发现:(1)政治参与显著正向预测地方政府信任;(2)活动有用性评价在政治参与和地方政府信任间起部分中介作用;(3)宣传教育频率负向调节政治参与和有用性评价的关系以及有用性评价的中介效应。上述结果表明,多渠道提升公众政治参与意识,合理把握政府宣传教育频率是促进地方政府信任提高的可选策略。Based on government publicity and education,the present study aimed to investigate the relationship between political participation and local government trust.A total of 2061 participants were investigated and analyzed in the present study.The results indicated that:(1)political participation significantly and positively predicted local government trust.(2)The relationship between political participation and local government trust was mediated by activity usefulness.(3)The frequency of publicity and education negatively moderated the relationship between political participation and activity usefulness and the mediating effect of activity usefulness,showing a diminishing marginal effect.These findings suggest that multi-methods to enhance the awareness of political participation and reasonably grasp the frequency of government publicity and education are optional strategies for promoting trust in local governments.
关 键 词:政治参与 地方政府信任 政府宣传教育 边际递减效应
分 类 号:D668[政治法律—政治学] B849[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49