检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐亚星 文穗 Xu Yaxing;Wen Sui(Law School of Hainan University,Haikou 570208)
出 处:《中阿科技论坛(中英文)》2022年第2期121-125,共5页China-Arab States Science and Technology Forum
基 金:海南省研究生创新科研课题“海南自贸港立法中FTA影响因素考量”(Hyb2020-34)。
摘 要:海南自由贸易港知识产权司法保护存在保护制度缺少体系化建设、保护水平难以对标国际标准、知识产权法院仍处于探索阶段发挥作用有限等问题。中国香港、上海自贸港(区),国外新加坡、美国和欧盟等自贸港(区)都实行知识产权行政保护和司法保护双轨模式,在知识产权司法保护上有较多成熟经验可供借鉴。海南自由贸易港知识产权司法保护制度的完善应当加快自贸港知识产权司法保护制度体系化建设、切实提高海南自贸港知识产权司法保护水平和逐步推进自贸港知识产权法院机制化运作,以实现海南自贸港高水平与高标准的知识产权司法保护目标。There are some problems in the judicial protection of intellectual property rights in Hainan Free Trade Port(FTP).For instance,the protection system lacks systematic construction,the level of protection failed to meet international standards,and the intellectual property court is still in the exploratory stage and its role is limited.FTPs in Singapore,the United States,the European Union,Hong Kong and Shanghai have all implemented the dual-track model of administrative and judicial protection of intellectual property rights,which can provide experience for Hainan FTP.Hainan FTP should accelerate the systematic development of a judicial protection system,improve the level of judicial protection of intellectual property and gradually advance the institutionalized operation of the intellectual property courts in order to achieve the goals of high-level and high-standard intellectual property judicial protection of Hainan FTP.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222