生态女性主义视阈中《弗兰肯斯坦》与《裂缝》的比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Frankenstein and The Cleft from the Perspective of Ecofeminism

作　　者：张书勉 Zhang Shumian(School of Foreign Languages and Literature,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学外国语学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《齐鲁师范学院学报》2022年第1期150-156,共7页Journal of Qilu Normal University

摘　　要：主要运用生态女性主义文学批评的研究方法,对《弗兰肯斯坦》与《裂缝》的文本进行了较为深入的对比剖析。两部作品都对男权中心主义和人类中心主义予以了颠覆式批判,倡导男女平等、互助、互惠,以及人与自然和谐相处。囿于时代所限等,《弗兰肯斯坦》的作者玛丽·雪莱以较隐晦的叙事方式,表述其生态女性主义思想。主要得益于社会的进步,《裂缝》的作者多丽丝·莱辛则淋漓尽致地把自己对男女两性及人与自然之间的关系等深度思考的生态女性主义主张,毫无掩饰地呈现在作品中。在当今世界,两部作品所蕴含的一些较为合理的生态女性主义的伦理理念等,可以为构建和谐、可持续发展的人类社会提供一定的借鉴。An in-depth comparative analysis of Frankenstein and The Cleft is provided from the perspective of ecofeminism.Both works are subversive critiques of androcentrism and anthropocentrism,advocating equality and reciprocity between men and women,as well as harmony between humans and nature.Given the constraints of her time,Mary Shelley,the author of Frankenstein,expresses her eco-feminist ideas in a subtler narrative style.On the other hand,Doris Lessing,the author of The Cleft,presents her eco-feminist thoughts based on a deeper reflection on the relationship between men and women and between man and nature,without any disguise mainly thanks to the progress of society.In today’s world,some of the reasonable ethical concepts of ecofeminism embodied in the two works may shed light on building a harmonious and sustainable human society.

关 键 词：生态女性主义 《弗兰肯斯坦》 《裂缝》 玛丽·雪莱 多丽丝·莱辛 

分 类 号：I106.4[文学—世界文学]