辩证法的历险与拯救:恩格斯“自然辩证法”的实践向度解读  

The Adventure and Salvation of Dialectics: the Practical Interpretation of Engels' Dialectics of Nature

作　　者：张潇梦 ZHANG Xiao-meng(School of Marxism,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou Gansu 730000)

机构地区：[1]兰州大学马克思主义学院,甘肃兰州730000

出　　处：《甘肃高师学报》2022年第1期138-142,共5页Journal of Gansu Normal Colleges

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“当代新帝国主义问题的政治哲学研究”(19FZXB090);甘肃省优秀研究生“创新之星”项目“《资本论》视域下新发展格局的建构路径研究”(2021CXZX-067)。

摘　　要：恩格斯晚年致力于“自然辩证法”的理论研究,意在阐明唯物主义辩证法的本质特征,并为后者提供“自然史的基础”。与马克思的这一学术分殊却为恩格斯招致了是否背离唯物主义辩证法的一桩公案。部分西方马克思主义学者认为“自然辩证法”遗弃了唯物主义辩证法的实践性而又重归旧形而上学的认识论层面,这种解读路径遮蔽了“自然辩证法”中本有的属人性与革命性维度,引致“自然辩证法”在马克思主义思想沿革史上的“历险”。对“自然辩证法”的理论解蔽与合理认知既关系到恩格斯个人辩证法思想的真实高度,也直接影响到由马克思、恩格斯共同创立的经典马克思主义的思想品格。Engels devoted himself to the theoretical research of"dialectics of nature"in his later years,aiming to clarify the essential characteristics of materialist dialectics and provide"the basis of natural history"for the latter.This academic difference with Marx caused Engels a case of whether to deviate from materialist dialectics.Some Western Marxist scholars believe that"dialectics of nature"abandons the practicality of materialist dialectics and returns to the epistemological level of the old metaphysics,which obscures the human nature and revolutionary dimension of"dialectics of nature".This results the"adventure"of"dialectics of nature"in the history of Marxist thought.The theoretical deconstruction and reasonable cognition of"dialectics of nature"are not only related to the true height of Engels'personal dialectics,but also directly affect the ideological character of classic Marxism co-founded by Marx and Engels.

关 键 词：自然辩证法 唯物主义辩证法 实践 人与自然关系 

分 类 号：B024[哲学宗教—哲学理论]