检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘德法[1] 白雅楠 Liu Defa;Bai Yanan(Law School,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan 450001)
出 处:《河南财经政法大学学报》2022年第2期44-51,共8页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
摘 要:新近立法对污染环境罪内容的改动集中体现了伦理层面价值观的演变历程、犯罪论层面结果无价值和行为无价值的动态调整,以及刑罚论层面报应主义与预防主义的分配理念。三个层面存在的三组二律背反又存在一定的逻辑关联与发展联系,均可归结为刑法积极立法趋势下存在的法益保护早期化与刑法谦抑性的矛盾问题。我国环境犯罪治理的发展道路应当坚守刑罚法规的适正性,以罚则内容明确、处罚范围适中、罪行轻重均衡为具体标准,在刑罚配置上贯彻落实比例原则、细化罚金刑适用幅度甚至扩展保安处分措施。The changes in the content of the crime of environmental pollution in recent legislation embodies the evolution of values at the ethical level,the dynamic adjustment of worthless results and worthless behaviors at the level of crime theory,and the distribution ideas of retribution and precaution at the level of penalty theory.There are three groups of antinomy at three levels,and there are certain logical connections and development connections,which can all be attributed to the contradiction between the early protection of legal interests and the modesty of criminal law under the positive legislative trend of criminal law.The development path of environmental crime governance in China should adhere to the appropriateness of penalty laws and regulations,take clear penalty content,moderate penalty scope and balanced severity of crimes as specific standards,implement the principle of proportionality in penalty allocation,refine the application range of fine penalty and even expand security measures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49