检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:代杰 宣暄 DAI Jie;XUAN Xuan(Institute of Physical Education Anqing Teachers College,Anqing 246133,China)
出 处:《湖北师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2022年第1期83-90,共8页Journal of Hubei Normal University:Natural Science
摘 要:运用文献资料、数理统计、录像观察、秩和比等研究方法,对第18届男篮世界杯中32支参赛队攻防能力的各项数据进行RSR综合分析,评价中国男篮攻防等级,探讨中国男篮与对手攻防能力优势与差距。结果表明:中国男篮的进攻能力隶属为D级水平球队,防守能力隶属为C级水平球队,攻防综合能力隶属为D级水平球队。中国男篮在进攻方面过于依赖于内线得分,三分球、罚球以及前场篮板能力弱,进攻结构配置不合理,球员基本功不扎实等问题。在防守方面,犯规次数多,盖帽能力弱,缺乏侵略性防守,个人防守和团队防守未能很好的融合,整体的防守连续性差等问题。Using the research methods of literature,mathematical statistics,video observation and rank sum ratio,this paper makes a comprehensive RSR analysis on the data of the attack and defense ability of 32 teams in the 18th men’s Basketball World Cup,evaluates the attack and defense level of Chinese men’s basketball team,and discusses the advantage and gap between Chinese men’s basketball team and its direct opponents.The results show that the Chinese men’s basketball team’s offensive ability RSR value is 0.35,belonging to the d-level team,the defensive ability RSR value is 0.50,belonging to the C-level team,and the comprehensive offensive and defensive ability RSR value is 0.39,belonging to the d-level team.In terms of attack,the Chinese men’s basketball team relies too much on inside scoring,weak ability of three-point ball,free throw and front court rebounding,highlighting the unreasonable allocation of attack structure,unsound basic skills of players and other problems.In terms of defense,there are many fouls,weak blocking ability,lack of aggressive defense,poor integration of individual defense and team defense,poor overall defense continuity and so on.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229