检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张宏辉 吴亮 李鸿 余杨忠 袁永盛 张沥元 李仕忠 赵见波 潘江涛 詹华思 石海涛 陈贵仁 ZHANG Honghui;WU Liang;LI Hong;YU Yangzhong;YUAN Yongsheng;ZHANG Liyuan;LI Shizhong;ZHAO Jianbo;PAN Jiangtao;ZHAN Huasi;SHI Haitao;CHEN Guiren(Kunming Natural Resources Comprehensive Investigation Center of China Geological Survey,Kunming,Yunnan 650100,China;Geophysical investigation center of China Geological Survey,Langfang,Hebei 065000,China;Haikou Marine Geological Investigation Center of China Geological Survey,Haikou,Hainan 571127,China;Urumqi Natural Resources Comprehensive Investigation Center of China Geological Survey,Urumqi,Xinjiang 830000,China)
机构地区:[1]中国地质调查局昆明自然资源综合调查中心,云南昆明650100 [2]中国地质调查局地球物理调查中心,河北廊坊065000 [3]中国地质调查局海口海洋地质调查中心,海南海口571127 [4]中国地质调查局乌鲁木齐自然资源综合调查中心,新疆乌鲁木齐830000
出 处:《现代地质》2022年第1期225-243,共19页Geoscience
基 金:中国地质调查局“公益性基础地质调查”二级项目“乌蒙山岩溶石山区昭通-毕节地区区域地质调查”(DD20191012)。
摘 要:为加深滇东北乌蒙山地区峨眉地幔柱演化的认识,对该区的峨眉山玄武岩及下伏的栖霞组—茅口组开展了详细地质调查工作,并对峨眉山玄武岩进行了岩石学、同位素年代学研究,结果显示:峨眉地幔柱活动导致的地壳抬升形成了研究区栖霞组—茅口组西薄东厚、峨眉山玄武岩西厚东薄的地质特征,地壳开始隆升的时限为(273.1±3.1)Ma,地壳抬升约为512 m,但该过程是缓慢进行的,并未造成茅口组顶部灰岩的差异风化剥蚀,茅口组与峨眉山玄武岩基本上为连续沉积;乌蒙山地区的峨眉山玄武岩经历4次大规模的喷发,分别对应4个亚旋回,每一亚旋回以沉积夹层开始,后期为大规模的溢流相玄武岩,4次大规模喷发时限分别为(261.9±2.0)Ma、(261.8±3.7)Ma、(261.6±1.9)Ma、(261.5±2.1)Ma,主喷发期历时约0.4 Ma,地幔柱活动可能持续到(258.86±0.71)Ma;在同位素年代学数据基础上,依据栖霞组—茅口组厚度差异、峨眉山玄武岩各亚旋回横向及纵向变化特征、各亚旋回及沉积夹层的岩性和岩相特征,将峨眉地幔柱在乌蒙山地区的火山-沉积盆地演化关系划分为地幔柱隆升阶段(273.1~262.0 Ma)、玄武岩幕式喷发阶段(261.9~261.5 Ma)和地幔柱消亡阶段(261.5~258.86 Ma)。To deepen the understanding on the evolution of the Emeishan mantle plume in Wumengshan area of northeastern Yunnan,detailed geological investigations of the Emeishan flood basalt and the underlying Qixia-Maokou Formation in the area,as well as petrological and isotopic chronological studies of the Emeishan flood basalt have been carried out.The results show that the crustal uplift caused by the Emeishan mantle plume activity formed the geological characteristics of the Qixia-Maokou Formation,which is thin in the west but thick in the east,and the Emeishan flood basalt,which is thick in the west but thin in the east,and the crustal uplift started at(273.1±3.1)Ma,and the uplift was about 512 m.However,this process was slow and did not cause the differential weathering and denudation of the limestone at the top of the Maokou Formation.Besides,the Emeishan flood basalt and Maokou Formation were basically deposited continuously.The Emeishan flood basalt in the Wumengshan area may have undergone four large-scale eruptions,corresponding to four sub-cycles.Each sub-cycle started with a sedimentary interbed,covered by a large number of overflow basalt facies.The eruption timing of the four subcycles was determined to be(261.9±2.0)Ma,(261.8±3.7)Ma,(261.6±1.9)Ma,(261.5±2.1)Ma,respectively.The main eruption phase lasted for about 0.4 My,and the mantle plume activity may last until(258.86±0.71)Ma.Based on the isotope chronology data,according to the thickness difference of Qixia-Maokou Formation,the horizontal and vertical variation characteristics of each subcycle of Emeishan flood basalt,the lithology and lithofacies characteristics of each subcycle and sedimentary interbed,the volcanic-sedimentary basinal evolution of Emeishan mantle plume in Wumengshan can be divided into the mantle plume upwelling(273.1-262.0 Ma),the basalt eruption(261.9-261.5 Ma),and the mantle plume extinction stages(261.5-258.86 Ma).
分 类 号:P533[天文地球—古生物学与地层学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7