循证护理与常规护理对老年2型糖尿病患者的不同护理效果及SDS评分比较  

Comparison of Different Nursing Effects and SDS Score between Evidence-based Nursing and Conventional Nursing for Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

作　　者：张利娟 ZHANG Lijuan(Department of Internal Medicine,Fengshun County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Meizhou,Guangdong Province,514300 China)

机构地区：[1]丰顺县中医院内科,广东梅州514300

出　　处：《糖尿病新世界》2022年第1期131-134,共4页Diabetes New World Magazine

摘　　要：目的比较循证护理与常规护理对老年2型糖尿病患者的不同护理效果及SDS评分效果。方法选取2018年1月—2021年3月该院收治的100例2型糖尿病老年患者为研究对象。根据不同的护理方法,将50例采用循证护理的患者作为研究组,其他50例采用常规护理的患者作为对照组,观察患者生活质量、疾病认知率、血糖干预情况及SDS评分。结果研究组患者生活质量改善情况明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者疾病认知率(96.00%)显著高于对照组(80.00%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。护理前,两组患者血糖干预情况对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。护理前,两组患者SDS评分对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在老年2型糖尿病患者护理指导过程中,实施循证护理的价值要明显优于常规护理,可推广到临床。Objective To compare the different nursing effects and SDS score effects of evidence-based nursing and conventional nursing for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods A total of 100 elderly patients with type 2 diabetes who were admitted in the hospital from January 2018 to March 2021 were selected as the research objects.According to different care methods. Fifty patients with evidence-based care were used as the study group. The remaining 50 patients who received routine care were used as the control group to observe the patients’ quality of life, disease awareness rate, blood glucose intervention and SDS score. Results The improvement of quality of life in the study group was significantly better than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The disease cognition rate of the study group(96.00%) was significantly higher than that of the control group(80.00%), and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Before nursing, there was no statistically significant difference in blood glucose intervention between the two groups(P>0.05);after nursing, the study group was lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Before nursing, there was no statistically significant difference in SDS scores between the two groups(P>0.05);after nursing, the study group was lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P <0.05). Conclusion In the process of nursing guidance for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes, the value of implementing evidence-based nursing is significantly better than conventional nursing, it can be extended to the clinic.

关 键 词：循证护理 常规护理 老年2型糖尿病 不同护理 SDS评分 

分 类 号：R473[医药卫生—护理学]